***
*** RSSing Note: Article removed by member request. ***
***
Colleyville Lions Club now has an evening meeting for those members who have difficulty making the early morning meetings. These meetings will only be once a month (last Thursday of each month) at 530 pm at Tios Carlos Mexican restaurant in the meeting room (ON THE END BY WHOLE FOODS). This Thursday, 7/27, will be the first meeting. We have negotiated to have a taco bar in the back of the meeting room and will have beef and chicken tacos with all the sides and either ice tea or water for $10.00 a head. This way members can get there food and not be ordering off the menu during the meeting. This will allow us 45 minutes to eat and mingle with people arriving after work. The meeting itself will begin at 615 pm sharp so please come early and enjoy you meal and be ready for the meeting.
We will also be having some of our morning guest speakers at these meetings so they should be very informative. This week we are fortunate to have our very own District Governor, Lion Charlie Bethards, kick off these new meetings as our first guest speaker. This is a great opportunity for those who wish to be more involved with Lionism but are busy early mornings. It’s also a chance to reach out to those who have been hesitant about joining because of the hours so reach back out to them as well!
Southlake, Texas July 28,2017
The City Council candidates, and the date is set for the upcoming special election.
The election will take place September 9th with three candidates vying for the Place 6 seat. Here’s how they will appear on the ballot:
Visit the City’s Candidate Information page for each candidate’s filing information.
Denton County Residents needed as Poll workers
The City is in need of three volunteers to serve as Denton County Election Poll Workers for the September 9th Special Election. Please consider serving the community and taking part in the election process.
To be eligible for this unique opportunity, you must meet these specific requirements:
You will be paid for your service, as follows:
Early voting takes place August 23-September 5th. For more information about the election, please visit CityofSouthlake.com/Elections
Southlake, Texas July 28, 2017
National Mutt Day, also known as National Mixed Breed Dog Day, is all about embracing, saving and celebrating mixed breed dogs. To celebrate these special friends, the Southlake Parks and Recreation team has lots of fun activities planned for your family pet. You’ll find on-site print photos, puppy paw-print painting, grooming demonstrations, vet advice, and more. Southlake DPS will also give a presentation on pet safety including leash laws, reminding pet owners not to leave animals in hot cars, and who to contact about a loose or stray dog.
Best of all you will get to meet Mayor Laura Hill who is planning to bring her beloved family pet, Emma to Pups in the Park. We hope everyone can join us for this pet friendly event on Monday, July 31 at Boo Boo’s Community Dog Park located at 3901 N White Chapel Blvd.
The Parks and Rec team will also be raffling away several prizes including two tickets to a Rangers game, also dog treat baskets, grooming certificates, and more. Participants can enter the raffle by bringing any of the items listed to be donated to the Keller Regional Adoption Center. Donated items to bring include: Purina One dog and puppy food (dry), Purina One cat and kitten food (dry), rolls of paper towels, antibacterial hand soap, large/black heavy-duty trash bags, bleach, Pine-sol, fleece blankets, towels, dog and cat collars and leashes, dog and cat toys (dishwasher safe), and cat litter (large granules only).
Pups in the Park
Time: 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
Where: Boo Boo’s Community Park, 3901 N White Chapel Blvd.
When: Monday, July 31
If you need a four-legged friend, please check out the pets available for adoption at the Human Society of North Texas Keller Regional Adoption Center located at 330 Rufe Snow Dr. in Keller. The shelter is open Monday – Friday 12:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. and Saturday, 10:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. (closed on Sunday). If you would like to call ahead, the phone number is (817) 743-4711 or check out the pets available for adoption on their website.
For more information about Pups in the Park, contact Parks and Recreation at (817) 748-8019. To learn more about National Mutt Day and the special days dedicated to these furry friends visit.
Grapevine, Texas July 28, 2017
Arrest and booking photos are provided by law enforcement officials. Arrest does not imply guilt, and criminal charges are merely accusations. A defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty and convicted in a Court of Law.
Arrested on july 25, 2017 at 11:36 PM by Officer B. Grissom at the Great Wolf Lodge and Charged with;
1.) Public Intoxication – Alcohol, Bond set at $315.00,
2.) Resisting Arrest, Search or Transport, Bond set at $750, Total bond $1,065.
Arrested on July 25, 2017 at 3:21 PM by Officer J. Persson at 3512 Mercury and Charged With;
1.) Driving While Intoxicated, with an Open Alcohol Container in the Car, Bond set at $500,
2.) Duty of striking the unattended vehicle of Eddie J. Brewer of Mercury Dr. Grapevine, Bond set at $500,
3.) Duty on Striking a Hwy Fixture and Landscape damage more than $200 Bond set at $500…Total Bond $1,500.
Complete listing of Grapevine City Jail Bookins for the past week: 07-28-2017
Daily summaries: 07-20-2017
Keller, Texas July 31, 2017
Arrest and booking photos are provided by law enforcement officials. Arrest does not imply guilt, and criminal charges are merely accusations. A defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty and convicted in a Court of Law.
Arrested on July 18, 2017 at 9:20 AM by Officer G. Telesko at 100 Taylor Street and Charged with;
1.) Possession of Drug Paraphernalia Bond set at $421,
2.) On a Galveston, County Sheriff’s Office, Bond set at $1,000, Total Bond $1,421.
A review of Keller Police and Crime Incidents:
07-28-2017 Keller Crime Report
LNO Policy Note: Considering the long period taken to clear most cases through the court system, LNO does not have the ability to track the eventual outcome of every arrest.
LNO often is requested to remove data based on alleged clearance of charges at a later date. LNO therefore is expanding and restating our policy on removing information by request at a later date from the archives dating back to 2000. If you or someone you know has been reported arrested in this weekly column and subsequently been cleared of the charges inform LNO with verifiable information.
CLEARED OF CHARGES MEANS THE CHARGES WERE DISMISSED OR YOU WERE FOUND NOT GUILTY..SEND A COPY OF THIS INFORMATION VIA EMAIL. LNO will provide equal coverage to same or removal of information at requester’s choice. Note: A downward plea, for example “obstruction of a roadway” in lieu of a DWI/DUI is not considered “cleared of charges. On the other hand a deferred adjudication is deferred with the charges dismissed upon successful completion (with a copy of the proper document). Based on this criteria if an expunge order is presented; LNO will remove the photo and text.
However, LNO will bring forward and update the information if requested by the convicted party. If interested party makes claims of dismissal but public records indicate no dismissal; LNO may update information and bring forward other public record information.
Regarding any other removal options or Questions? Editor@LocalNewsOnly.com”
July 31, 2017
When Governor Abbott called legislators back to the Capitol, he laid out 20 items he wanted addressed. No other subjects are supposed to be addressed besides those on his official call.
One of those items was the “tree bill,” a bill to prevent municipalities from regulating tree removal on private property. The governor believes this is a sacred private property issue.
After legislators filed their bills, Abbott chose which ones he would accept.
Apparently, according to an exchange between Reps. Matt Rinaldi and Dade Phelan, the governor was very specific about which “tree bills” he wanted.
On Friday, the House took up HB 7 by Rep. Phelan. The bill would give tax credits to individuals who are penalized by their city governments for removing trees, IF they plant another tree on the property.
Abbott had wanted another bill, HB 70 by Paul Workman, which would have prohibited cities from issuing those penalties at all.
During the regular session, Phelan’s bill was passed and vetoed by Abbott.
Rinaldi took to the back microphone to question Phelan, asking, “is this the bill in conversation the governor has referred to as the wrong tree bill?”
Phelan responded, “that is his opinion, yes sir.”
Before the special session began, the twelve-member Freedom Caucus, of which Rinaldi is a member, immediately came out in support of the governor’s agenda. So it wasn’t surprising that the only NO votes on Friday were Freedom Caucus members (plus Reps. Hefner and Workman) because they saw it as direct defiance of Abbott.
Strangely though, Freedom Caucus Reps. Schaefer, Krause, Shaheen, Zedler, and Leach all voted for the bill. Leach could even be heard on the microphone telling Rinaldi that he was “wrong” for opposing it.
In a statement on Facebook, Rep. Matt Krause explained his vote departure from the Freedom Caucus:
“This is the bill the governor vetoed. Many of us were prepared to vote no for that reason and that it was not as strong as Workman’s bill. But, we were told by the Governor’s office that they wanted us to vote for the bill in order to get it over to the Senate where it could be strengthened. So, it was actually the Governor’s office asking us to support it – which some of us did. Those that did not had perfectly good reasons for doing so as well.”
As pretty much everyone knows by now, there is a major power struggle taking place in the Capitol, with conservative House members calling publicly for years for the replacement of Speaker Joe Straus. They got major backup this year when Lt. Governor Dan Patrick basically declared war on him as well.
Abbott’s call for a special session to address many of the issues that were killed by the House provided Patrick and the Freedom Caucus ammunition to pressure Straus to move to the right, or potentially face another challenge for his powerful chair.
So, if the governor indeed changed his mind on the tree bill, it could be a signal that he is prepared to compromise with Speaker Joe Straus on other issues as well. If that happens, it absolves Straus and company of the guilt of killing the governor’s agenda. This would be a major setback in conservatives’ ongoing war with the Speaker.
But then again, maybe the governor is just saving his energy for a bigger fight. Time will tell.
Austin, Texas August 1, 2017
Like a growing number of cities, Austin, Texas, is getting ready for the arrival of autonomous vehicles. On any given afternoon, self-driving test models can be seen darting along a Formula One race track. More than 500 electric vehicle charging stations are already spread throughout the city. (Autonomous cars are expected to utilize electric drivetrains.) In March, the city council adopted a resolution prioritizing plans for self-driving vehicles.
Austin’s transportation director, Robert Spillar, is working to prepare the city. But earlier this year, a realization hit him about what driverless cars might mean for his budget. “It struck me,” he says. “Half my revenue for transportation capacity and operations improvements is based on a parking model that may be obsolete in a dozen years.”
In the not-too-distant future, fleets of fully autonomous vehicles could be transporting riders all across Austin’s urban landscape, largely eliminating not only the need for private vehicles but also the revenue they currently bring in. Parking fees are a critical funding source for the Austin Transportation Department, accounting for nearly a quarter of its total budget. Driverless vehicles would also cut into parking tickets and traffic citations, two other significant revenue streams for Austin and many other cities. “Municipalities generate a whole lot of revenue as a byproduct of parking management and traffic enforcement,” Spillar says. “If all that suddenly disappears, we’ve got a huge financial issue to deal with.”
The Cities Where Autonomous Vehicles Would Be Most PracticalIn Preparation for Driverless Cars, States Start Upgrading RoadsStates May Downshift Regulations for Driverless CarsSpecial Report: How Autonomous Vehicles Could Constrain City Budgets
To assess how vulnerable cities’ budgets could be, Governing conducted the first national analysis of how city revenues might be affected by autonomous vehicles. For the 25 largest U.S. cities, we requested and obtained revenues for parking collections and fines, traffic citations, traffic camera fines, gas taxes, vehicle registration, licensing and select other fees. In all, these 25 cities collectively netted nearly $5 billion in auto-related revenues in fiscal 2016, or about $129 per capita. While some cities will hardly see any effect on their budgets, others could incur big fiscal consequences. For example, New York City generated $1.2 billion in 2016.
Additional sources of revenue could further decline in the long run. Because they’re electric, autonomous vehicles will further reduce general sales tax collections on gasoline. Many cities also receive revenues from taxis, car rentals and other businesses expected to undergo disruption in a driverless car era.
At the same time, there will be cost savings, such as a reduced need for traffic enforcement. It’s far too early to say exactly when and how autonomous vehicles will reshape American cities. But regardless of what unfolds, their introduction will carry numerous fiscal implications for local budgets.
High-end vehicles today already offer limited automated driving features. Market research firms expect fully autonomous vehicles that require no human intervention to be commercially available by the early part of the next decade. It’s likely to take much longer for them to proliferate to the point where parking and other public revenue streams incur major reductions. But in the long run, those hits seem inevitable.
Lois Scott, the former chief financial officer of Chicago who is studying autonomous vehicles, foresees transportation being offered as a package service in the relatively near future. People might pay hourly rates for rides. Vehicles will pick up commuters throughout the day and park themselves in remote storage facilities when not in use. Once widespread adoption occurs, Scott expects cities to lose an average of 10 to 15 percent of operating revenues. “The combination of an electric vehicle world and the sharing economy will have a powerful impact,” she says.
Estimates of just how much city revenues may eventually diminish vary considerably. Cities identified as most likely to incur the steepest revenue losses in our analysis were densely populated localities where parking comes at a premium. Those reporting the highest related revenues per capita included San Francisco ($512), Washington, D.C. ($502), and Chicago ($248). Totals were much larger in cities assessing special taxes on parking operators, deploying traffic cameras or those receiving substantial shared revenues from states in the form of gas taxes or vehicle registration fees. By comparison, any revenue reductions should hardly register in Houston, Jacksonville and some other cities. Texas’ large cities reported among the lowest per capita revenues, largely a result of the state distributing essentially no vehicle revenues.
Most big cities maintain large and diverse enough revenue streams to absorb such hits to their budgets. But for some smaller jurisdictions, sizable financial shortfalls may lie ahead. In addition to the data from big cities, Governing analyzed a more limited set of fiscal year 2014 financial numbers reported to the Census Bureau by a national sample of counties, townships and villages. In 74 mostly smaller jurisdictions, parking revenues and all types of legal fines, court fees and forfeiture of deposits totaled more than 10 percent of general revenues.
Localities most reliant on parking revenues tend to be resort towns. This is particularly apparent in Delaware’s coastal communities. In Rehoboth Beach, parking-related revenues account for 30 percent of the current budget. That makes sense given that most streets throughout the city are metered, and spots fill up quickly during the summer months. “[Autonomous vehicles] could have a huge impact on the city’s budget and the services we provide,” says Krys Johnson, the city’s director of communications.
For several large cities, gasoline taxes account for the single largest source of revenue. Chicago and Columbus, Ohio, generate significant funds from locally administered gas taxes. Meanwhile, most other cities receive state-levied fuel taxes, plus general sales taxes on purchases. Phoenix, for instance, received $116.7 million in gas taxes last year.
It’s assumed that autonomous vehicles won’t be speeding or running red lights, another source of revenue for cities. On average, the largest cities took in $8.5 million in traffic citation payments. But generally, traffic tickets aren’t significant revenue generators, and savings from reduced enforcement and administration costs should offset much of the loss. Most jurisdictions aren’t making huge sums of money on speeding and red light cameras, either. Still, Chicago, New York and the District of Columbia all reported camera revenues around or exceeding $100 million.
Numerous tiny rural and suburban jurisdictions scattered across the country, however, still rely heavily on traffic citations to fund government. Some are notorious speed traps. This has surfaced as an issue in Missouri, where lawmakers have passed a bill limiting localities’ fines and court charges to 20 percent of general operating revenue.
Some independent government agencies and special purpose municipal entities will be especially liable to major revenue hits. Convention centers and airports generate much of their revenue from parking. The Phoenix Aviation Department, for instance, reported $75 million in public parking revenues last year. Parking-related income is often routed to cities’ general funds. But some transportation departments and other agencies with budgets directly tied to these revenues will be much more vulnerable financially.
The Ann Arbor, Mich., Downtown Development Authority, in addition to supporting improvement projects and programs, manages several parking lots and garages that provide about three-quarters of its annual revenue. Susan Pollay, the authority’s director, says she’s already seeing a shift away from car commuting. Bike-sharing and car-sharing services are gaining in popularity, and more young people are choosing not to get driver’s licenses. “It’s not going to be a switch flipped in five years,” she says. “We’re starting to experience it today.” Pollay is made aware of the potential effects on her budget every time she sees autonomous vehicles from the University of Michigan’s nearby testing facility cruising city streets.
Still, Ann Arbor’s growth has pushed its parking system to peak capacity during the daytime. That’s led some residents and local officials to call for the construction of a new public garage. Others want to hold off, given the disruption that’s set to take place with autonomous vehicles and on-demand ride-hailing. “It could turn out 100 different ways,” Pollay says. “We have to design and plan flexibly.”
Parking tickets are a major source of revenue in many communities. But with automated cars, that and other traffic-related revenues could disappear. (Shutterstock)
Just how much autonomous vehicles alter budgets will depend largely on how they’re adopted. A future in which low-cost shared autonomous vehicle services transport multiple passengers might lead many people to decide to go car-free, resulting in lower parking revenues, driver’s license fees and other costs tied to owning a car. Alternatively, if private autonomous vehicles emerge as the predominant mode of transportation, a larger share of the population might be willing to accept longer commutes or travel more often. This could add to cities’ congestion woes and likely drive up infrastructure costs. Ashley Hand of the consulting firm CityFi says she expects a hybrid of the two scenarios: Some will own private autonomous vehicles, while numerous other households will opt to go car-free to save money.
The way the technology evolves will hold major fiscal consequences for public transportation agencies. Driverless cars could help solve the “last mile” problem of better connecting people in less populated areas to transit hubs. They could also cut labor costs, which comprise about three-quarters of bus operating expenses for the nation’s largest transit systems.
But there’s concern that some riders might simply forgo transit altogether, says Jennifer Bradley, who heads the Aspen Institute’s Center for Urban Innovation. In New York City, a recent study by transit consultant Bruce Schaller found ridership for app-based ride services tripled between the spring of 2015 and last fall, while bus ridership declined and subway ridership dropped for the first time in years. If ride-hailing and ride-sharing companies don’t have to pay drivers, they could potentially offer transportation at a price so low that people will chose to travel by car all the way to their destinations, draining transit ridership revenues.
Gasoline tax revenues may be first to shrink as vehicles shift to electric drivetrains. Volvo recently announced that, by 2019, all its new models will be electrics or hybrids. In 2015, state-levied motor fuel taxes amounted to $11 billion in transfers to local government or direct spending on local infrastructure. Another $5.2 billion went to transit, according to Federal Highway Administration data.
Later on, if the costs of commuting by ride-sharing come down and more people opt out of vehicle ownership, governments will lose out on license and registration fees and sales taxes on vehicle purchases. Eleven of the 25 largest cities reported annual registration and licensing revenues exceeding $25 million. Scott, Chicago’s former chief financial officer, also expects an eventual reorientation of entire local property tax systems as autonomous vehicles improve mobility and increase property values in neighborhoods currently deemed less desirable.
This leads to the larger issue of how motorists should pay for transportation, one that policymakers have long contended with. Many seem to think the solution is a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) fee as a replacement for traditional gas taxes. The idea isn’t new, but autonomous vehicles and the new technology that accompanies them would make VMT fees much easier to administer, says Paul Lewis of the Eno Center for Transportation. Eno proposes a national per-mile fee on autonomous vehicles as a baseline, with the ability to vary rates based on types of vehicles, number of passengers and other factors. Oregon operates a limited VMT program now, charging volunteer participants 1.5 cents per mile and crediting them for fuel taxes paid. The state Department of Transportation reports it’s considering testing new technology that would enable localities to assess their own fees on top of the state rate, which would likely require federal approval.
States and localities might recoup lost revenue by taxing or licensing autonomous vehicle services. Seattle collected $2.4 million in the last fiscal year in car-sharing fees paid by services such as car2go in lieu of charging subscribers for on-street parking. Electric vehicles will also require charging stations. But these sources alone probably won’t overcome sizable revenue reductions elsewhere. “We couldn’t find adequate sources of new revenue that would compensate for the losses,” says Kevin Desouza, a professor at Arizona State University who researches the issue.
In other ways, however, the introduction of autonomous vehicles should yield significant cost savings. Parking and traffic enforcement would require far fewer resources. If autonomous vehicles help to ease congestion, infrastructure maintenance and construction costs could go down in the long run. The parking lots and garages that currently take up huge portions of downtown land could be redeveloped into new revenue-generating residential or commercial buildings as the need for parking subsides.
“We’re going to start to rethink how we make use of our public facilities,” says Ken Husting of Los Angeles’ parking management division. One development project in the city’s downtown features a parking garage that can be altered to eventually accommodate retail and other uses. Some vehicles on the market today already employ technology enabling them to park in much tighter spaces. Unused street parking spaces, Husting says, could be converted into wider sidewalks, bike lanes or transit lanes.
One thing everyone agrees on is that cities shouldn’t wait to plan for autonomous vehicles. Desouza says American cities are well behind other parts of the world in this regard. A 2015 National League of Cities analysis of urban transportation planning documents found that only 6 percent of the plans considered the potential effects of driverless technology. It’s critical, Desouza says, that governments first engage citizens on what’s important to them. “The hits can be minimized,” he says, “but it really comes down to how the local governments are planning for it.”
While it’s far too early to know exactly how the technology will evolve, the consequences are certain to go far beyond any city’s bottom line. “It’s hard to think of an aspect of city government,” says the Aspen Institute’s Bradley, “that won’t eventually be touched and changed by autonomous vehicles.”
Grapevine, Texas August 7, 2017
Arrest and booking photos are provided by law enforcement officials. Arrest does not imply guilt, and criminal charges are merely accusations. A defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty and convicted in a Court of Law.
Arrested on August 1, 2017 at 10:34 AM by Officer C. Taylor at 2400 Aviation Dr. N. and Charged with; Arrested on August 3, 2017 at 11:29 by Officer P. Wolan at 520 S. Main and Charged with; Remainder of Grapevine Jail Book-ins in PDF: Weekly_Book-ins LNO Policy Note: Considering the long period taken to clear most cases through the court system, LNO does not have the ability to track the eventual outcome of every arrest. LNO often is requested to remove data based on alleged clearance of charges at a later date. LNO therefore is expanding and restating our policy on removing information by request at a later date from the archives dating back to 2000. If you or someone you know has been reported arrested in this weekly column and subsequently been cleared of the charges; inform LNO with verifiable information. CLEARED OF CHARGES MEANS THE CHARGES WERE DISMISSED OR YOU WERE FOUND NOT GUILTY..SEND A COPY OF THIS INFORMATION VIA EMAIL. LNO will provide equal coverage to same or removal of information at requester’s choice. Note: A downward plea, for example “obstruction of a roadway” in lieu of a DWI/DUI is not considered “cleared of charges. If on the other hand, a deferred adjudication is deferred with the charges dismissed upon successful completion (with a copy of the proper document). Based on these criteria; or if an expunge order is presented; LNO will remove the photo and text at no charge. However, LNO will bring forward and update the information if requested by the convicted party. If interested party makes claims of dismissal but public records indicate no dismissal; LNO may update information and bring forward other public record information as well.”
Injury to Children or Elderly or Disable Person Intentionally causing Bodily Injury, a Third Degree Felony, Bond set at $2,500.
Arrested on August 1, 2017 at 2:02 PM by Officer L. Roberts at 3000 Grapevine Mills Parkway and Charge with;
1.) Theft of Property more than $100, but less than $750, Bond set at $500.
2.) Theft of Property more than $100 but less than $750, Bond set at $500, Total Bond $1,000.
Driving While Intoxicated 3rd or MORE! Bond set at $2,500.
Ft. Worth, Texas, August 7, 2017
The Tarrant County Commissioners Court was presented with a balanced budget proposal this morning, which includes a 1 cent decrease from the current tax rate. The total proposed operating budget is $602,646,589 with a tax rate of 24.4 cents per $100 valuation. Tarrant County taxes on a home with a value of $100,000 would be $244. While the tax rate has either decreased or stayed the same since 2006, this is the second consecutive 1 cent decrease.
During today’s hearing, the Commissioners Court was asked to consider a 3 percent merit-based increase to non-law enforcement employees. Law enforcement structure adjustments were also increased by 3 percent. The budget also includes adding 19 positions to the budget, mainly to address increased workload and to pay for unfunded mandates. Some new positions will be offset by reductions-in-force.
Compared with the other five large urban counties (Travis, El Paso, Harris, Bexar and Dallas) Tarrant’s tax rate is the second lowest.
The Commissioners Court is scheduled to adopt the budget and set the tax rate on September 12th.
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS (August 7, 2017) – Grab your racket and join the fun on September 16 and 17 at the GrapeFest Tennis Classic as part of the 31st Annual GrapeFest – A Texas Wine Experience, presented by Bank of the West. The family-friendly event, produced by TNT Tennis, welcomes junior and adult players to compete in a two-day tournament.
GAME, SET, MATCH: GRAPEFEST® TENNIS CLASSIC TO SERVE UP FUN SEPTEMBER 16 AND 17
The 2017 GrapeFest Tennis Classic will feature various draws including Men’s and Women’s Open Double prize money events, Mixed Open Doubles, Mens’ and Womens’ Singles and Boys’ and Girls’ Singles and Doubles by age group. TNT Tennis will award $4,000 in total prize money for the Mens’ and Womens’ Open Double events. Matches will take place at various Grapevine tennis courts including Dove Park, Grapevine High School and Colleyville Heritage High School from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturday, September 16 with most finals being held Sunday, September 17.
The entry fee for the adult and junior opens are $21 per player for singles and $16 per player for doubles. The prize money doubles events are $50 per player. Entry fee includes tournament participation, official GrapeFest Tennis Class t-shirt, admission to GrapeFest, player’s party on Saturday night for adults and the carnival of tennis on Friday evening for juniors. Participants can register at www.USTA.com or www.TNTtennis.net. For additional information, please contact Austin Wynne at 214-668-1619 or Kelly Langdon at langdonk1@verizon.net.
The 31st Annual GrapeFest takes place September 14, 15, 16 and 17 in Historic Downtown Grapevine. For more information, please contact the Grapevine Convention & Visitors Bureau at 817-410-3185 or visit www.GrapeFest.com.
About Bank of the West
Bank of the West is proud to be an Independent Community Bank, serving the DFW area for 3 decades; helping to create flourishing communities by supporting small business and putting your dollars to work LOCALLY.
Bank of the West, Member FDIC, Presenting Sponsor of the 31st Annual GrapeFest.
Dallas, TX, August 7, 2017
The Dallas 9/11 Memorial Stair Climb is an annual remembrance that uniquely honors fallen first responders while supporting the families that are left behind. Choreographed around the events of September 11, 2001, the climb incorporates incredible symbolism in an intensely physical setting.
More information on the Dallas 9/11 Memorial Stair Climb can be found on our website:
www.dallasstairclimb.com.
Southlake, Texas August 8, 2017
Arrest and booking photos are provided by law enforcement officials. Arrest does not imply guilt, and criminal charges are merely accusations. A defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty and convicted in a Court of Law.
Arrested on July 29, 2017 at 1:25 PM by Officer P. Logan at Tassey’s Home address and Charged with; Arrested on August 1, 2017 at 7:08 PM by Officer C. Melton at 600 N. Carroll Ave and Charged With; 1.) Fail to Identify as a Fugitive giving False Information, Bond set at $1,000, Arrested on July 31, 2017 at 4:58 PM by Officer B. Hernandez at 1100 E Hwy 114 and Charged with; Arrested on August 1, 2017 at 9:36 PM by Officer J. Weinschreider at 1471 FM 1709 and Charged with; 1.) Possession of a Controlled Substance PG 1 Less than 1 G, Bond set at $4,000, LNO Policy Note: Considering the long period taken to clear most cases through the court system, LNO does not have the ability to track the eventual outcome of every arrest. LNO often is requested to remove data based on alleged clearance of charges at a later date. LNO therefore is expanding and restating our policy on removing information by request at a later date from the archives dating back to 2000. If you or someone you know has been reported arrested in this weekly column and subsequently been cleared of the charges; inform LNO with verifiable information. CLEARED OF CHARGES MEANS THE CHARGES WERE DISMISSED OR YOU WERE FOUND NOT GUILTY..SEND A COPY OF THIS INFORMATION VIA EMAIL. LNO will provide equal coverage to same or removal of information at requester’s choice. Note: A downward plea, for example “obstruction of a roadway” in lieu of a DWI/DUI is not considered “cleared of charges. If on the other hand, a deferred adjudication is deferred with the charges dismissed upon successful completion (with a copy of the proper document). Based on these criteria; or if an expunge order is presented; LNO will remove the photo and text at no charge. However, LNO will bring forward and update the information if requested by the convicted party. If interested party makes claims of dismissal but public records indicate no dismissal; LNO may update information and bring forward other public record information as well.”
Driving While Intoxicated, Bond set at $1,000.
Driving while Intoxicated with an Open Alcohol Container in the Vehicle, Bond set at $1,500.
Arrested on July 31, 2017 at 3:22 PM by Officer B. Fitgerald at 2110 E FM 1709 and Charged with;
2.) Theft under $100, Bond set at $252,
3.) On a Highland Village PD Warrant for Seed Equal or Greater than 10% above posted, Bond set at $349.10,
4.) On a Highland Village PD Warrant for Violation of Driver License Restrictions, Bond set at $291..Total Bond: $1,892.10
Driving While Intoxicated, Bond set at $1,000
Arrested on August 01, 2017 at 9:36 PM by Officer J. Weinschreider at 1471 E. FM 1709 and Charged with;
1.)Possession of a Controlled Substance PG 1 Less than 1 G, a State Jail Felony, Bond set at $4,000,
2.) Possession of a Dangerous Drug, Bond set at $2,000…Total Bond; $6,000.
2.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for Failure to Yield the Right of Way, Bond set at $429.00,
3.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for no Operators License, Bond set at $390.00,
4.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for Window Tint, Bond set at $364.00,
5.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for No Operator’s License, Bond set at $390.00,
6.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for Moving Violation, Bond set at $318.50,
7.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for Driving without a License, Bond set at $414.83,
8.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for Failure to Maintain Financial Responsibility, Bond set at $455.00,
9.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for Failure to Yield Right of Way, Bond set at $435.50,
10.) On a Ft. Worth PD Warrant for Moving Violation, Bond set at $195.00,
11.) On an Arlington PD Warrant for No Valid Drivers License, bond set at $331.00,
12.) On an Arlington PD Warrant for Failure to maintain Financial Responsibility, Bond set at $481.00, Total Bond $8,201.83
Austin, Texas August 10, 2017
Last Thursday, 14 members of the House Republican Caucus wrote a letter to Representative Tan Parker requesting a meeting to develop procedures that the caucus will follow to elect the Speaker of the House for the 86th session as prescribed for in the Republican Party of Texas platform.
Members who requested this meeting were Reps. Matt Schaefer, Jonathan Stickland, Valoree Swanson, Kyle Biedermann, Mike Lang, Matt Shaheen, Matt Krause, Cole Hefner, Scott Sanford, Jeff Leach, Bill Zedler, Matt Rinaldi, Tony Tinderholt, and Briscoe Cain.
At the present time, there are no rules set in place for an election of the speaker from within the caucus as the Republican Party of Texas platform calls for in Plank 70:
Plank 70 of the platform states: We oppose the use of pledge cards and call of the Republican members to caucus after each November general election to determine by secure secret ballot, their candidate for Speaker. We also call for the Republican members to vote as a unified body for their selected speaker candidate when the legislature convenes in regular session.
Today, Representative Tan Parker, House Republican Caucus Chair, has notified members that there will be a meeting on August 17thwhich is next Thursday at 9 am for the sole purpose of discussing and/or adopting procedures to determine the caucus’ nominee for the Speaker of the House in the 86th session.
It is very important that all members be present at this meeting and to publicly state that they will attend.
Contacting your House member can bring awareness to this meeting and can help determine if they will be in attendance. Contact info for House members can be found here.
Keller, Texas August 10, 2017
PDF Report of Most recent crime incidents in Keller: 08-10-2017 weekly incident report
August 11, 2018
In response to the LoneStar Article
It’s about time. These common sense rules should have been in place long ago. They would help stop the game playing and let the house get on with doing the people’s business. I wonder what our state Rep, Giovanni Capriglione, thinks about this effort.
Natalie Genco
Colleyville
Colleyville, Texas August 11, 2017
Arrest and booking photos are provided by law enforcement officials. Arrest does not imply guilt, and criminal charges are merely accusations. A defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty and convicted in a Court of Law.
Arrested on August 10, 2017 at 11:27 PM by Officer J. Campbell at 1300 Wood Veil Drive, Bedford, TX and Charged with; Driving While Intoxicated Bond set at $1,000. Arrested on August 6, 2017 at 2:14 AM by Officer D. Smith at 4900 Colleyville, Blvd. and Charged with; Driving while Intoxicated bond set at $1,000. LNO Policy Note: Considering the long period taken to clear most cases through the court system, LNO does not have the ability to track the eventual outcome of every arrest. LNO often is requested to remove data based on alleged clearance of charges at a later date. LNO therefore is expanding and restating our policy on removing information by request at a later date from the archives dating back to 2000. If you or someone you know has been reported arrested in this weekly column and subsequently been cleared of the charges; inform LNO with verifiable information. CLEARED OF CHARGES MEANS THE CHARGES WERE DISMISSED OR YOU WERE FOUND NOT GUILTY..SEND A COPY OF THIS INFORMATION VIA EMAIL. LNO will provide equal coverage to same or removal of information at requester’s choice. Note: A downward plea, for example “obstruction of a roadway” in lieu of a DWI/DUI is not considered “cleared of charges. If on the other hand, a deferred adjudication is deferred with the charges dismissed upon successful completion (with a copy of the proper document). Based on these criteria; or if an expunge order is presented; LNO will remove the photo and text at no charge. However, LNO will bring forward and update the information if requested by the convicted party. If interested party makes claims of dismissal but public records indicate no dismissal; LNO may update information and bring forward other public record information as well.” Please note, letters that threaten LNO as a media source, will be forwarded to law enforcement. Any other questions? Editor@LocalNewsOnly.com
Arrested on August 4, 2017 at 10:29 PM by Officer D. Smith at 1800 G lade Rd. and Charged with;
Driving while Intoxicated with a BAC more than 0.15, bond set at $1,500.
Arrested on August 5, 2017 at 2:27 AM by Officer E. Olivarez at 2400 Hall-Johnson Road and Charged with;
1.) Driving while license Invalid, Bond set at $220.90,
2.) Tampering or Fabricating physical Evidence with an Intent to Impair a Police Investigation, Bond set at $4,000..Total Bond $4,330.90.
Arrested on August 8, 2017 at 5:11 PM by Officer C. Terrell on South Bound Colleyville Blvd and Charged with;
1.) Driving while Intoxicated, Bond set at $1,000,
2.) Public Intoxication, Bond set at $344, total Bond $1,344.
Arrested on August 5, 2017 at 2:27 AM by Officer E. Olivarez at 2400 Hall-Johnson Road and Charged with;
1.) Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, Bond set at $421,
2.) Tampering or Fabricating physical Evidence with the Intent to Impair a Police Investigation, Bond set at $4,000,
3.) Possession of a Controlled Substance PG1 More than 4 Gram but less than 200 G, Bond set at $5,000…Total Bond $9,421.00.
Arrested on August 7, 2017 at 1:43 AM by Officer K. Bruner at 5800 Colleyville Blvd and Charged with;
Possession of marijuana less than 2 ounces, Bond set at $1,000.
Arrested on August 11, 2017 at 3;14 AM by Officer J. Campbell at Taco Casa 4609 Colleyville Blvd. and Charged with.
This happy looking fellow was charged with Driving while Intoxicated perhaps one reason for the smile is he was more than smashed with a BAC ofer 0.15!